"An additional assumption was that the processes for theory development were new to nursing and hence, nurses in graduate programs learned strategies for advancing knowledge from other disciplines. This assumption was debunked with the knowledge that nurses were always engaged in knowledge development, driven by their experiences in clinical practice. Because of these assumptions, most of the early writing about theory development was about outlining strategies that should be used, rather than strategies that have already been used in the discipline to develop theories. Theorists themselves did not uncover or adequately discuss ways by which they developed their theories, therefore the tendency was to describe processes that were based on theories developed in other disciplines, mainly the physical and social sciences. And an implicit assumption was made that there should be a single strategy for theory development, some claiming to begin the process from practice, and others believing it should be driven by research"--Provided by publisher.
Location
Call Number
Status
Last Check-In
ASU Main (3rd floor)
RT84.5 .M45 2011
On Shelf
Nov 27, 2016
CMU Storage Books
RT84.5 .M45 2012
On Shelf
Sep 15, 2016
APA Citation (style guide)
Meleis, A. I. (2012). Theoretical nursing: development and progress. Fifth Edition. Philadelphia, Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Chicago / Turabian - Author Date Citation (style guide)
Meleis, Afaf Ibrahim. 2012. Theoretical Nursing: Development and Progress. Philadelphia, Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Chicago / Turabian - Humanities Citation (style guide)
Meleis, Afaf Ibrahim, Theoretical Nursing: Development and Progress. Philadelphia, Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2012.
MLA Citation (style guide)
Meleis, Afaf Ibrahim. Theoretical Nursing: Development and Progress. Fifth Edition. Philadelphia, Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2012.
Note! Citation formats are based on standards as of July 2022. Citations contain only title, author, edition, publisher, and year published. Citations should be used as a guideline and should be double checked for accuracy.
ISBN:
9781605472119, 1605472115
Notes
Bibliography
Includes bibliographical references (pages 502-635) and indexes.
Description
"An additional assumption was that the processes for theory development were new to nursing and hence, nurses in graduate programs learned strategies for advancing knowledge from other disciplines. This assumption was debunked with the knowledge that nurses were always engaged in knowledge development, driven by their experiences in clinical practice. Because of these assumptions, most of the early writing about theory development was about outlining strategies that should be used, rather than strategies that have already been used in the discipline to develop theories. Theorists themselves did not uncover or adequately discuss ways by which they developed their theories, therefore the tendency was to describe processes that were based on theories developed in other disciplines, mainly the physical and social sciences. And an implicit assumption was made that there should be a single strategy for theory development, some claiming to begin the process from practice, and others believing it should be driven by research"--Provided by publisher.
Grouped Work ID:
49f231f6-d7fb-46ec-441d-5c1f4ed9e695
Record Information
Sep 06, 2022 09:45:01 PM |
Sep 06, 2022 09:45:48 PM |
Nov 09, 2022 08:27:48 PM |
MARC Record
04013cam a2200565 i 4500 |
693512876 |
OCoLC |
20120216180145.0 |
101207t2012 paua b 001 0 eng |
|a 2010051628 |
|a 101549089|2 DNLM |
|a 015729804|2 Uk |
|a 9781605472119 |
|a 1605472115 |
|a (OCoLC)693512876 |
|a DNLM/DLC|b eng|e rda|c DLC|d YDX|d NLM|d YDXCP|d COU|d WS7|d BWX|d CDX|d VET|d LANGC|d UKMGB|d CLZ |
|a pcc |
|a CLZA |
|a RT84.5|b .M45 2011 |
|a 2011 F-449 |
|a WY 86 |
|a WY 86|b M519 2011 |
|a 610.7301|2 22 |
|a Meleis, Afaf Ibrahim,|0 //id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n84004218|e author. |
|a Theoretical nursing :|b development and progress /|c Afaf Ibrahim Meleis, PhD, FAAN, Margaret Bond Simon Dean, Professor of Nursing and Sociology, University of Pennsylvania, School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. |
|a Fifth Edition. |
|a Philadelphia :|b Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins,|c [2012] |
|c ©2012 |
|a xiii, 672 pages :|b illustrations ;|c 26 cm |
|a text|2 rdacontent |
|a unmediated|2 rdamedia |
|a volume|2 rdacarrier |
|a Includes bibliographical references (pages 502-635) and indexes. |
|a Pt. 1. Positioning for the journey -- On being and becoming a scholar -- Theory : metaphors, symbols, definitions. |
|a Pt. 2. From can't to Kant : barriers and forces toward theoretical thinking -- On the way to theoretical nursing : stages and milestones. |
|a Pt. 3. The discipline of nursing : perspective and domain -- Sources, resources, and paradoxes for theory -- Our syntax : an epistemological analysis. |
|a Pt. 4. Nursing theories through mirrors, microscopes, or telescopes -- A model for evaluation of theories : description, analysis, critique, testing, and support -- On needs and self-care -- On interactions -- On outcomes. |
|a Pt. 5. Challenges and opportunities for a theoretical future -- Concept development -- Theory development -- Middle-range and situation-specific theories -- Measuring progress in a discipline. |
|a Pt. 6. Historical writings in theory -- Historical and current theory bibliography. |
|a "An additional assumption was that the processes for theory development were new to nursing and hence, nurses in graduate programs learned strategies for advancing knowledge from other disciplines. This assumption was debunked with the knowledge that nurses were always engaged in knowledge development, driven by their experiences in clinical practice. Because of these assumptions, most of the early writing about theory development was about outlining strategies that should be used, rather than strategies that have already been used in the discipline to develop theories. Theorists themselves did not uncover or adequately discuss ways by which they developed their theories, therefore the tendency was to describe processes that were based on theories developed in other disciplines, mainly the physical and social sciences. And an implicit assumption was made that there should be a single strategy for theory development, some claiming to begin the process from practice, and others believing it should be driven by research"--Provided by publisher. |
|a Nursing|x Philosophy.|0 //id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh90003890 |
|a Nursing Theory.|0 //id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D009742 |
|a .b35111938 |
|a MARCIVE August, 2017 |
|a MARCIVE extract Aug, 5 2017 |
|1 .i7079781x|b 1010002087419|d as|g -|m |h 4|x 0|t 0|i 0|j 18|k 120217|n 11-27-2016 20:17|o -|a RT84.5 .M45 2011 |
|1 .i76574325|b 1080005943082|d cusmb|g -|m |h 3|x 0|t 0|i 0|j 18|k 130513|n 09-15-2016 23:41|o -|a RT84.5|r .M45 2012 |
|a 01|b CLZ |
|a Loaded with m2btab.ltiac in 2017.08 |
|e -|f eng|a as|a cu |