Select any two Graphics Cards for comparison
Intel Core i9-10900F 10-Core 2.80GHz
Intel Core i7-9700K 8-Core 3.6GHz Intel Core i7-8700K 6-Core 3.7GHz
Intel Core i9-10900T 10-Core 1.90GHz - - - - Core Speed 1480 Mhz
1000 Mhz
Boost Clock 1582 Mhz
1089 Mhz
Architecture Pascal P102
Maxwell GM200-400-A1 (x2)
Release Date -
-
Notebook GPU No
No
1920x1080
2560x1440
3840x2160
Memory 11264 MB
24576 MB
Memory Speed 1376 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Bus 352 Bit
768 Bit
Memory Type -
-
Memory Bandwidth 484.4GB/sec
673.2GB/sec
Shader Processing Units 3584
6144
Technology 16nm
28nm
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) 7680x4320
4096x2160
VGA Connections -
-
DVI Connections 2
1
HDMI Connections 1
1
DisplayPort Connections 3
-
Power Required (Watts) 220 Watts
450 Watts
Recommended PSU 600 Watts
750 Watts
Recommended Processor Core i7-6900K 8-Core 3.2GHz
Core i7-5960X 8-Core 3.0GHz
Recommended RAM 16 GB
16 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution 3840x2160
5760x1080
Recommended CPU Possible GPU Upgrades GPU Variants
Price now 352$
Games supported 100%
Price now 600$
Games supported 97%
Contents
General info
Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.
Place in performance rating | 20 | 99 |
Value for money | 86.75 | 13.84 |
Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | Pascal (2016−2021) |
GPU code name | Pascal GP104 SLI | GP102 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 16 August 2016 (6 years ago) | 25 July 2016 (6 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $1,199 |
Current price | $352 | $600 (0.5x MSRP) |
Value for money
To calculate the index we compare the characteristics of graphics cards against their prices.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 5120 | 3584 |
Core clock speed | 1556 MHz | 1418 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1733 MHz | 1531 MHz |
Number of transistors | 14400 Million | 11,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 16 nm |
Thermal design power (TDP) | no data | 250 Watt |
Texture fill rate | no data | 342.9 |
Floating-point performance | no data | 10,974 gflops |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile and Titan X Pascal compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | large | no data |
Interface | no data | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | no data | 267 mm |
Width | no data | 2-slot |
Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
SLI options | + | no data |
Memory
Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5X |
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 8 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz | 10000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | no data | 480.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | no data | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
HDMI | no data | + |
G-SYNC support | + | + |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
API support
APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.
DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | no data | 6.4 |
OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
OpenCL | no data | 1.2 |
Vulkan | + | + |
CUDA | + | + |
Benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
GTX 1080 SLI Mobile 51.98
+54.4%
- 3DMark Vantage Performance
- 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
- 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
- 3DMark Fire Strike Score
- 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
- 3DMark Ice Storm GPU
- SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
- SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
- SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
- SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
- SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
- SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
- SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase
- SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
- SPECviewperf 12 - Maya
- SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
- SPECviewperf 12 - Catia
- SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks
- SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX
- SPECviewperf 12 - Creo
- SPECviewperf 12 - Medical
- SPECviewperf 12 - Energy
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
GTX 1080 SLI Mobile 55056
Titan X Pascal 100948
+83.4%
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
GTX 1080 SLI Mobile 49645
+37.9%
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
GTX 1080 SLI Mobile 172848
+27.9%
Benchmark coverage: 14%
GTX 1080 SLI Mobile 22106
Titan X Pascal 23165
+4.8%
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
GTX 1080 SLI Mobile 39902
+46.1%
Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.
Benchmark coverage: 8%
GTX 1080 SLI Mobile 443627
Titan X Pascal 496070
+11.8%
Benchmark coverage: 3%
GTX 1080 SLI Mobile 142
+14.5%
Benchmark coverage: 2%
Titan X Pascal 16.3
+66.3%
This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.
Benchmark coverage: 2%
GTX 1080 SLI Mobile 142
+46.5%
Benchmark coverage: 2%
Titan X Pascal 16.5
+68.4%
Mining hashrates
Cryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile and Titan X Pascal. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | no data | 0.98 kh/s |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 137 | 133 |
1440p | no data | 85 |
4K | 89 | 67 |
Popular games
- Full HD
Low Preset - Full HD
Medium Preset - Full HD
High Preset - Full HD
Ultra Preset - 1440p
High Preset - 1440p
Ultra Preset - 4K
High Preset - 4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 80−85 −26.8% | 104 +26.8% |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 85−90 −8% | 95 +8% |
Battlefield 5 | 130−140 −13.3% | 153 +13.3% |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 130−140 −11.5% | 155 +11.5% |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 85−90 +9% | 78 −9% |
Far Cry 5 | 110−120 −36.1% | 162 +36.1% |
Far Cry New Dawn | 100−110 −41.5% | 150 +41.5% |
Forza Horizon 4 | 140−150 +16.5% | 127 −16.5% |
Hitman 3 | 160−170 −1.2% | 163 +1.2% |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 100−110 −0.9% | 107 +0.9% |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 80−85 −25.3% | 104 +25.3% |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 120−130 −8.8% | 136 +8.8% |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 90−95 −15.6% | 104 +15.6% |
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 80−85 −6.1% | 87 +6.1% |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 85−90 +3.5% | 85 −3.5% |
Battlefield 5 | 130−140 −8.9% | 147 +8.9% |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 130−140 +13% | 123 −13% |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 85−90 +23.2% | 69 −23.2% |
Far Cry 5 | 110−120 −25.2% | 149 +25.2% |
Far Cry New Dawn | 100−110 −32.1% | 140 +32.1% |
Forza Horizon 4 | 140−150 +22.3% | 121 −22.3% |
Hitman 3 | 160−170 +12.6% | 143 −12.6% |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 100−110 +26.2% | 84 −26.2% |
Metro Exodus | 90−95 −3.2% | 96 +3.2% |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 80−85 +43.1% | 58 −43.1% |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 120−130 +9.6% | 114 −9.6% |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 181 −1.7% | 184 +1.7% |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 90−95 −1.1% | 91 +1.1% |
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 80−85 +22.4% | 67 −22.4% |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 85−90 +39.7% | 63 −39.7% |
Battlefield 5 | 130−140 −1.5% | 137 +1.5% |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 85−90 +44.1% | 59 −44.1% |
Far Cry 5 | 110−120 −17.6% | 140 +17.6% |
Far Cry New Dawn | 100−110 −19.8% | 127 +19.8% |
Forza Horizon 4 | 140−150 +32.1% | 112 −32.1% |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 115 +21.1% | 95 −21.1% |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 90−95 +40.6% | 64 −40.6% |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 85−90 +6% | 84 −6% |
Hitman 3 | 100−110 +17.2% | 87 −17.2% |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 70−75 +18.3% | 60 −18.3% |
Metro Exodus | 55−60 +0% | 58 +0% |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 40−45 +16.2% | 37 −16.2% |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 80−85 +5.1% | 78 −5.1% |
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 55−60 +52.8% | 35−40 −52.8% |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 55−60 +15.7% | 51 −15.7% |
Battlefield 5 | 100−110 +40.3% | 70−75 −40.3% |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 40−45 +15.8% | 38 −15.8% |
Far Cry 5 | 90−95 −7.4% | 101 +7.4% |
Far Cry New Dawn | 85−90 −14.8% | 101 +14.8% |
Forza Horizon 4 | 110−120 +56.9% | 70−75 −56.9% |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 45−50 +4.3% | 46 −4.3% |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 50−55 +4.1% | 49 −4.1% |
Hitman 3 | 55−60 +19.1% | 47 −19.1% |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 40−45 +17.6% | 34 −17.6% |
Metro Exodus | 35−40 +0% | 36 +0% |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 27−30 +16.7% | 24 −16.7% |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 40−45 +2.4% | 42 −2.4% |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 87 +27.9% | 68 −27.9% |
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 35−40 −2.7% | 38 +2.7% |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 35−40 +9.4% | 32 −9.4% |
Battlefield 5 | 60−65 −12.7% | 71 +12.7% |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 20−22 +11.1% | 18 −11.1% |
Far Cry 5 | 50−55 +0% | 53 +0% |
Far Cry New Dawn | 55−60 +0% | 56 +0% |
Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80 +4.1% | 73 −4.1% |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 27−30 +3.8% | 26 −3.8% |
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance rating | 51.98 | 33.66 |
Memory bus width | 256 | 384 |
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 5120 | 3584 |
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile
since it shows better performance.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile is a notebook card while Titan X Pascal is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Cast your vote
Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.
Competitors of GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile by AMD
We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile from AMD is Radeon RX 6750 XT, which is slower by 2% and lower by 2 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile:
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile 100
Competitors of Titan X Pascal by AMD
The nearest Titan X Pascal's AMD equivalent is Radeon Vega Frontier Edition, which is faster by 3% and higher by 9 positions in our performance rating.
Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
Compare
Here are some closest AMD rivals to Titan X Pascal:
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal 100
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
User rating
Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.
Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:
Rate NVIDIA Titan X Pascal on a scale of 1 to 5:
Questions and comments
Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.