How close is the movie to the book To Kill a Mockingbird?

Exclusively available on IvyPanda Available only on IvyPanda

Updated: Jul 9th, 2020

To kill a Mockingbird is an interesting novel amongst the most famous books in American literal cycles. It is a typical novel that has attracted the interest of film makers, in terms of adaptation. The novel prompted the creation of a movie, under the same title, and it is evident that certain similarities and differences are present.

Apparently, the differences between the book and the movie remain conspicuous and unique due to several implications. It is evident that some issues in the film are presented in a better way than it is done in the book. The novel may also have some strong points and attributes as opposed to the film.

Narration stands out as a major difference between the movie and the novel. To Kill a Mockingbird is a story based on Scout’s narration of major events, but this aspect is seemingly avoided in the film. The director focuses on the actions of Jem in a bid to forego Scout’s first-person narration in the movie.

In other words, the role played by Jem is broadened in the movie as opposed to the narration provided by his brother. Here, the viewer is able to witness all the events visually. For instance, Scout’s narration of Boo’s mysterious activities is replaced with Jem’s actions on the same. Jem locates all the letters at the tree, accompanies his father to Helen Robinson’s house, after her husband’s death, as well as stays home to watch over his sister. These events were previously narrated by Scout in the novel.

The film also introduces additional characters and this stands out as a big difference. For instance, the novel only dedicates one paragraph to Jem’s mother as the two brothers engage in a conversation about her. However, the film introduces Jem’s mother for the audience to see. Additionally, viewers are able to see more characters like Robinson’s father and children since they are not greatly featured in the book.

The issue of time also greatly features in the differences portrayed in the book and the novel. It is important to note that the film, To Kill a Mockingbird entails most of the aspects depicted in the novel. However, several omissions are evident. In the film, the contact between Mrs. Dubois and the children is omitted.

In simpler terms, viewers of the film are not able to witness the events that transpired inside the classroom. Episodes that characterize other minor characters like Miss Gates are also omitted from the film due to time factors. The film’s setting takes slightly more than two years as opposed to the novel’s story line which took three years.

The director certainly avoided the first-person narration provided by Scout because films basically base on visual properties. It is, therefore, difficult to present narrations in a film. The director also introduced more characters in a bid to fully develop the story line as presented in the novel. Viewers are able to see the characters and they become more conversant with the story line.

Additional characters also introduce more communication cues and the story becomes interesting and relevant. Lastly, the director omitted other parts in the film because films are generally shorter and more precise than books. It is not possible to cover all the events covered in a book when making a film as exemplified in To Kill a Mockingbird. The film is definitely better than the novel due to additional characters, important communication cues, and precision.

This essay on “To Kill a Mockingbird”: Book and Movie Differences was written and submitted by your fellow student. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly.

Removal Request

If you are the copyright owner of this paper and no longer wish to have your work published on IvyPanda.

Request the removal

Need a custom Essay sample written from scratch by
professional specifically for you?

801 certified writers online

Many books will usually be adapted by film makers to turn into a movie. However, the book and movie are usually not the exact same. The award-winning book To Kill A Mockingbird written by Harper Lee was soon turned into a movie in 1962. This black and white production of the book consists of the same plot and same characters. However, the movie leaves out some events, such as Scout’s school play. The book and movie both portray a small town in Alabama that has a huge trial. They tell the story from the point of view of Scout. Scout is the daughter of Atticus, the lawyer defending the suspect, Tom Robinson. Tom is a black man that is accused of rape. Atticus has very strong evidence that helps the reader decide that Tom Robinson is innocent,…show more content…
He does things for the better of his reputation, not thinking about how it would affect other people. Bob Ewell is the father of eight kids and he lost his wife. His family is in the lower class and have little to no education. The Ewells are first introduced introduced in chapter 3 in the book when the teacher finds lice on Burris Ewell's hair. This part of the book, however, isn’t portrayed in the movie. The Ewells later on begin to play a bigger part in the movie. Tom Robinson’s case was ordered because of the Ewells. Mayella accused Tom Robinson of rape, so she wouldn’t be considered a disgrace to the society for wanting a black man. Bob Ewell is one of the witnesses and the book describes him as being nervous. “In answer to the clerk’s booming voice, a little bantam cock of a man rose and strutted to the stand, the back of his neck reddening at the sound of his name. When he turned around to take the oath, we saw that his face was as red as his neck. We also saw no resemblance to his namesake. A shock of wispy new-washed hair stood up from his forehead; his nose was thin, pointed, and shiny; he had no chin to speak of- it seemed to part of his crepey neck.” (227) I expected Bob Ewell to be a tall, scrawny man that would look very messy, even at the court. I also thought he would look like a farmer that is always chewing on a piece of hay and walking around like they’re all that. The movie shows…show more content…
The Radley House was a creepy house that could be mistaken as abandoned. No one would dare to go near the house and would warily walk past it. The film also portrayed Bob Ewell as a person with little education and was very arrogant. He got an innocent man put into jail, could have abused his daughter, spit on a person that was trying to do what they thought was right for their morals, and tried to kill kids that had done absolutely nothing to him. When Bob Ewell attacked Jem and Scout, it made people furious. Bob Ewell attempted to stab two young kids who were just trying to go home. The viewer was able to predict that something major was going to happen with the suspenseful music that was playing. The footsteps that could be heard also made the viewer and Scout and Jem wonder who was following them. Jem and Scout stopped every couple minutes to see if anyone was behind them. The expression on the actors face and the black and white made the scene seem more scary, which made the viewer feel as if they were actually there with Scout and Jem. Even though the movie took out many scenes that were portrayed in the book, the movie still kept the overall themes, messages and symbols that Harper Lee had represented in the

How accurate is the To Kill a Mockingbird movie to the book?

What is the difference between the book and movie To Kill a Mockingbird?

What was left out of the movie To Kill a Mockingbird?

Is the movie A Time to Kill based on the book To Kill a Mockingbird?