Should student be allowed to leave school for lunch

A prisoner: a person who is trapped with zero freedom and forced to eat horrendous food. Students identify themselves as prisoners of high school: forced to learn, forced to do work they do not want to do, and worst of all, forced to eat disgusting food. Students are unsatisfied with the food available to them through the cafeterias. Because students are unhappy, they feel they should have the freedom to leave their school campus for a lunch break everyday. Most students refuse to eat at school simply out of protest. Students refusing to eat leads to negative effects on their academic performance and behavior. Students should be allowed to leave their campus for lunch breaks because leaving would give them a break, give them a sense of freedom, and also give them an incentive to perform better in school. …show more content…
Students often daze off halfway through a lesson and then struggle when it comes time to do classwork, quizzes, or tests. If students have permission to leave for lunch, their minds could take a break. Students’ brains need a break with all the AP and Honors classes that they take today. If students are allowed to take a lunch break, they may find it easier to pay attention in their classes. Off campus lunch breaks would allow students to enjoy themselves during the school day because during their breaks they could hang out with their friends or even take a nap. Giving students a lunch break would also allow students more time to get a head start on their homework or even catch up on homework and sleep. If students are able to get their homework done during a break, they would have more free time after school for sports, jobs, or other activities. Students also could get to bed earlier and get a better night’s sleep. Off campus lunch breaks would help students become well-rounded, and students would feel less stressed during the school

I love a good Cookout milkshake as much as the next guy, but leaving school to go get it is where I draw the line. Leaving campus to get food during school hours has been banned as long as I have been at Grady, and rightfully so. It brings safety risks to both those who leave and those who remain on campus; not to mention the temptation to skip the rest of the day after chowing down on your third Big Mac. As I see it, the policy doesn’t need to change.

Many argue that because the school lunch is so terrible, students should be allowed to go buy food from finer establishments, such as fan favorites Zaxby’s and Cookout. I agree that school lunches are not good and that improvements need to be made. But students are not leaving campus for healthier options like Metro Fresh or Kale Me Crazy. Students usually go to McDonald’s or Cookout because they provide cheap fast food, and they are broke, time-deprived students. These meals are generally worse for students than the food served in the cafeteria, offering little-to-no nutritional value. Because of this, the rule barring students from leaving campus not only promotes heart health, but saves them from potential obesity as well.

Back when my parents were in high school, they were allowed to leave school for lunch. However, my parents both grew up in small towns, the only thing of interest being the occasional crop circle. Living in Atlanta is different. With a metro area population of around five million, you never know who might follow you back to campus, especially with such delicious food in hand. Grady has had incidences of intruders on campus in the past, and having kids coming and going during the day will only make that problem exponentially more difficult to control. Leaving school for lunch would only bring unneeded risks to our student population.

Most of us don’t enjoy all the classes we take, and by the end of the day, there’s nothing we love more than going home. That temptation is amplified when the freedom is staring us right in the face. Many more students would skip class if they were actually granted permission to leave campus. No longer would mischievous students worry about an administrator thwarting their attempts of escape, because they would already be off school grounds.

And the truth of the matter is that students find a way to leave campus to get lunch whether the school allows it or not. The only way to stop kids from leaving school is to remove the desire of wanting to leave, or put up barbed wire. Neither of those are practical, so the best option is to have better school lunch. Perhaps’ if the school brought the restaurants that students like to school, students wouldn’t feel as strong of a desire to skip class.

Possibly the biggest reason why we are not allowed to leave is our liability while at school. If we get into a sticky situation, it’s on the school. It opens the school up to potential lawsuits, and that is a big no-no in Atlanta Public School’s book.

Leaving school for lunch is not the solution to the problem. The risks are too high for the reward. Having a steady flow of people coming and going from campus greatly increases the risk of a stranger entering campus. I can only see academic productivity dropping as kids will have more temptation to skip school once they have already left campus. And with all these hazards, Atlanta Public Schools would be creating a storm of liability and opening itself up to many potential lawsuits by letting us leave for lunch. All in all, I believe the rule to not let kids leave school to get lunch is valid.