Pension/Survivors benefitsIf you live in AK, AZ, CA, CO, HI, ID, IA, KS, MN, MT, NE, NV, NM, ND, OK, OR, SD, TX, UT, WA, WY, Mexico, Central America, South America, or the Caribbean Show Department of Veterans Affairs If you live in CT, DE, FL, GA, ME, MD, MA, NH, NJ, NY, NC, PA, RI, SC, VT, VA, WV, DC, Puerto Rico, or Canada Department of Veterans Affairs If you live in AL, AR, IL, IN, KY, LA, MI, MS, MO, OH, TN, or WI Department of Veterans Affairs National Cemetery AdministrationPlease refer to your EducationPlease refer to your Veterans Health AdministrationPlease refer to your Veteran Readiness and Employment (VR&E)Please refer to your InsurancePlease refer to your Loan guarantyPlease refer to your "high-level" redirects here. For other uses, see High level. High-level and low-level, as technical terms, are used to classify, describe and point to specific goals of a systematic operation; and are applied in a wide range of contexts, such as, for instance, in domains as widely varied as computer science and business administration. High-level describe those operations that are more abstract in nature; wherein the overall goals and systemic features are typically more concerned with the wider, macro system as a whole. Low-level describes more specific individual components of a systematic operation, focusing on the details of rudimentary micro functions rather than macro, complex processes. Low-level classification is typically more concerned with individual components within the system and how they operate. Features which emerge only at a high level of description are known as epiphenomena. Differences[edit]Due to the nature of complex systems, the high-level description will often be completely different from the low-level one; and, therefore, the (different) descriptions that each deliver are consequent upon the level at which each (differently) direct their study. For example,
Uses[edit]
Examples[edit]
See also[edit]
References[edit]
What are the two types of reviews?Scoping reviews are exploratory and they typically address a broad question, compared to a systematic review that typically has a more targeted question. Researchers conduct scoping reviews to assess the extent of the available evidence, to organize it into groups and to highlight gaps.
What are the different types of reviews?Five other types of systematic reviews. Scoping review. Preliminary assessment of the potential size and scope of available research literature. ... . Rapid review. ... . Narrative review. ... . Meta-analysis. ... . Mixed methods/mixed studies.. |