What is the motive to avoid success

  • What is the motive to avoid success
    Access through your institution

What is the motive to avoid success

What is the motive to avoid success

Abstract

Horner's (1968) “fear of success” study was replicated and expanded. One hundred seventy-seven high school (HS) and college students wrote stories in response to the following cues: “After first-term finals, John (Anne) finds himself (herself) at the top of his (her) medical-school class.” Results indicated similarity of response of HS men, HS women, and college men, all of whom expressed more fear of success imagery in response to the Anne cue than to the John cue. College women did not conform to this pattern.

References (8)

  • et al.

    A theory of achievement motivation

    (1966)

  • J.S. Coleman

    The adolescent society

    (1961)

  • M.S. Horner

    Sex differences in achievement motivation and performance in competitive and non-competitive situations

  • B.N. Phillips et al.

    Factors associated with anxiety and their relation to the school achievement of adolescents

    Psychological Reports

    (1960)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (4)

View full text

Copyright © 1974 Published by Elsevier Inc.

230 male and 230female adolescents were tested on two instruments Motive to Avoid Success (Hornet, Tresemer, Berens, & Watsan, 1973), and a Fear of Appearing Incompetent (Good & Good, 1973a). Sex differences were investigated which showed that females were significantly higher on motive to avoid success and fear of appearing incompetent than males. A significant positive correlation was revealed between Motive to Avoid Success and Fear of Appearing Incompetent hi females.

**********

The concept of Motive to Avoid Success (MAS) proposed by Homer (1968) is described as a disposition to be anxious about achieving success because of expectations of negative consequences (such as, social rejection and feeling of being unfaminine) as a result of succeeding. This motive affects behaviour by inhibiting achievement striving and by causing anxiety when success is attained (Homer, 1972, 1973). Homer measured motive to avoid success with a TAT that had as its cue "After first term finals, Anne (John) finds herself (himself) at the top of her (his) medical school class" (p.101). Individual protocols were scored according to the presence or absence of anxious imagery related to the situation depicted by the cue. Her results showed the presence of MAS more in females. She remarked that the motive to avoid success is largely responsible for the conflict and inhibition women often experience in achievement situations. Her contention that females portray more imagery has been supported by researchers at various stages (Bhogle & Murthy, 1990; Singh & Kapoor, 1990). Despite the widespread acceptance of this construct different researches showed great inconsistencies, which researchers felt were due to insufficient attention to scoring procedures.

As a result of such inconsistencies several objective measures were designed to measure motive to avoid success, which showed results different from what Homer had obtained (Cano, Solomon, & Holmes, 1984; Forbes & King, 1983).

However, Atkinson (1966) stated that self descriptive and projective measures are not measuring the same thing. Good and Good (1973b) devised an objective measure to measure motive to avoid success, on which results similar to Homer were achieved. Good and Good (1973a) further also constructed an objective measure of fear of appearing incompetent which showed that female students were significantly higher than males.

The present study was designed to check the findings of Good and Good in the Indian set up. Precisely the objectives are: (i) To study the sex differences on motive to avoid success and fear of appearing incompetent; (ii) to study the relationship between the projective measure of motive to avoid success and fear of appearing incompetent, in males and females; and (iii) to study the usefulness of the new measure of motive to avoid success as proposed by Homer, Tresemer, Berens, and Watson (1973).

METHOD

Sample

* A total 460 adolescents (230 males and 230 females) with their age ranging from 18 to 23 years were taken as a sample.

Instruments

Motive to Avoid Success

It was developed by Homer et al. (1973). The subjects were asked to write a story around neutral cue sentences. They examined a written cue for 30 seconds followed by 5 minutes to write a story. There were four cues, suggested as appopriate, for measuring motive to avoid success presented in the following order: (i) Sita/Mohan is sitting in a chair with a smile on her/his face; (ii) After dinner Ram/Sheela went back to his/her desk; (iii) Radha/Aman is talking to an older person about something important; and (iv) Usha/Rahul learned that she/he received the highest score on the national merit examination.

Motive to avoid success was scored by detecting the presence of imagery in six content categories which yield values from -2 to +8 for each story (Homer et al., 1973). The motive to avoid success score was the sum of all the scores obtained on all the stories, a higher score denoting higher motive to avoid success and vice versa.

Fear of Appearing Incompetent

Good and Good (1973a) have developed this scale. It consists of 36 items, which are to be answered in a Yes/No response dichotomy, indicative of the presence or absence of the fear.

Procedure

Both the tests were scored keeping in view the instructions provided by the authors. Before scoring the TAT protocols for Motive to Avoid Success a trainer reliability of .89 was established.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Means and standard deviations for males and females on the Motive to Avoid Success and Fear of Appearing Incompetent Scale are presented in Table 1.

Univariate t-test was used to check the significance of difference between the males and the females. On the Motive to Avoid Success scale females had a mean score of 15.57, SD = 3.68; while the mean score of males is 13.72, SD = 4.36. The calculated t-value [t(458) = 4.91, p < .01] suggests a significant difference between the males and females on the construct of motive to avoid success.

On the fear of appearing incompetent scale the females had a mean score of 18.82, SD = 5.53 and the males had a mean score of 17.33, SD = 5.62. The calculated t-value [t(458) = 2.87, p < .01] suggests a significant difference between the males and the females, supporting the results of Good and Good (1973a).

A positive correlation between the scores of Fear of Success scale and "Fear of Appearing Incompetent scale appeared. Scores for males correlated r = .18 (p < .01), and scores for females correlated r = .30 (p < .01). The moderate significant positive correlation for females indicate that females naturally experience greater fear of many things. Though males have also shown a positive and significant correlation the relationship is not highly significant.

It is evident that females are higher on fear of success and fear of appearing incompetent as well. They are significantly different from the males on these constructs though sex role stereotypes expect the males to achieve, a condition which might lead one to expect greater fear of incompetence in males. At the same time, we should not overlook the idea that achievement situations are even seen as a challenge to show their worth for females in the fast developing set up.

But it is the fear of a number of things which distance them from the achievement situations reflecting upon the socialization practices commonly used with females in India. They have always been considered to be more incompetent than males despite their competencies. Thus to avoid situations which would in some way reflect their incompetence they tend to avoid all achievement situations.

The results support Homer's (1968, 1972) contention pertaining to motive to avoid success, and Good and Good (1973a) assessment relating to fear of appearing incompetent.

REFERENCES

Atkinson, J. W. (1966). Motives in fantasy, action, and society. A method of assessment and study. New Jersey: D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc. Princeton.

Bhogle, S., & Murthy, V. N. (1990). Fear of success in the Indian context. Journal of Personality and Clinical Studies, 6(1), 35-41.

Cano, L., Solemon, S., & Holmes, D. S. (1984). Fear of success: The influence of sex, sex role identity and components of masculinity. .Sex Roles, 10, 431-434.

Forbes, G. B., & King, S. (1983). Fear of success and sex role: These are reliable relationships. Psychological Reports, 53(1), 735-738.

Good, L. R., & Good, K. C. (1973a). An objective measure of the motive to avoid appearing incompetent. Psychological Reports, 32, 1075-1078.

Good, L. R., & Good, K. C. (1973b). An objective measure of the motive to avoid success. Psychological Reports, 33, 1009-1010.

Horner, M. (1968). Sex differences in achievement motivation and performance in competitive and non-competitive situations. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Michigan.

Homer, M. S. (1972). Towards an understanding of achievement related conflicts in women. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 157-175.

Homer, M. S. (1973). The measurement and behavioural implication of fear of success in women. In J. W. Atkinson, & T. O. Raynor '(Eds.), Motivation and Achievement. New York: Wiley.

Horner, M. S., Tresemer, D. W., Berens, A. E., & Watson, R. I. Jr. (1973). Scoring manual for an empirically derived scoring system for Motive to Avoid Success. Unpublished Manuscript, Harvard University.

Singh, S., & Kapoor, R. (1990). Some correlates of a projective measure of motive to avoid success in males and females. British Journal of Projective Psychology, 27(1), 21-28.

Received: February 7, 1996.

Sunindar Tung

Department of Psychology

Guru Nanak Dev University

Amritsar, India

Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Sunindar Tung, Department of Psychology, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar-143005, India.

Table 1
Means and standard deviations on Fear of Success and Fear of
Appearing Incompetent Scale

                        Males         Females
                      (n = 230)      (n = 230)

Variables             M      SD      M      SD     t

Fear of Success     13.72   4.36   15.57   3.68   4.91

Fear of Appearing   17.33   5.62   18.82   5.53   2.87
Incompetent

d.f = 458, * p < .01

COPYRIGHT 1996 National Institute of Psychology, Quaid-i-Azam University
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.

Copyright 1996 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.