It is often defined by ‘falsification, fabrication and plagiarism’ and can include making up data or results, incorrectly attributing authorship, gift authorship, manipulating research materials, equipment, or processes, or changing or omitting data, graphs, images or results. Show
Questionable research practices encompass a much wider group of misdemeanours, poor research design and other unhealthy practices. Some of these may be deployed in ignorance of the potential consequences for the integrity of the research rather than attempt to mislead – this is often referred to as ‘sloppy science’. The Colleges Research misconduct policy details the procedures for reporting and investigation of potential research misconduct allegations. What are the consequences of research misconduct?The consequences of research misconduct can be severe including preventable illness or the loss of human life due to misinformation in the literature or continued citing of retracted work. It can also result in wasted resources, both human and financial, when newer research or work is based on previous flawed or fraudulent research. Funding agencies often require that cases of research misconduct are reported to them which can be damaging to the careers of those who commit misconduct and there is a financial cost to the institution in investigating allegations. The retraction of papers and reputational risks of misconduct can be damaging to the research careers of those who commit misconduct Research practices necessarily vary across disciplines. To minimize the risk of unethical behavior in research and scholarship, the general practices outlined below, which come from a variety of sources, are recommended as an open framework for the development and discussion of best field-specific research practices within respective departments, centers, and laboratories at MIT. Authorship
Data Management and Ownership
Training and Responsibilities
Footnotes: Which of the following is considered to be research misconduct?University policy defines research misconduct as fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism in proposing, performing, or reviewing research or in reporting research results. Fabrication means making up data or results and recording or reporting them.
What is the first main phase in response to a research misconduct allegation?A response to an allegation of research misconduct will usually consist of several phases, including: (1) an inquiry--the assessment of whether the allegation has substance and if an investigation is warranted; (2) an investigation--the formal development of a factual record, and the examination of that record leading ...
Which of the following is the most important factor in determining who should be entitled to authorship?Which of the following is the primary criterion for authorship? Having made a significant intellectual contribution to the work.
Which of the following is most likely to own the data resulting from a research project?Which of following is most likely to own the data resulting from a research project? The institution where a federally-funded project takes place. In the research context, the term validity most commonly refers to: Whether operationalized terms actually measure what they purport to measure.
|