Which two pieces of evidence does not support plate tectonic?

Modern continents hold clues to their distant past. Evidence from fossils, glaciers, and complementary coastlines helps reveal how the plates once fit together.

Fossils tell us when and where plants and animals once existed. Some life "rode" on diverging plates, became isolated, and evolved into new species. Other life dispersed to new areas as continents reconnected, oceans narrowed, or chains of volcanic islands formed. Finding identical or similar fossils in areas separated by vast distances were some of the first clues that scientists used to reconstruct past plate movement. This distribution of fossils led to theories that the southern continents were once joined in a supercontinent called Gondwana.

Similar geologic formations on different continents show historic land connections. Antarctica’s mountains are an extension of South America’s Andes. If Southern Hemisphere continents were reassembled into a single landmass, glacial remnants in Africa and India would realign.

More to explore

Students will explore tectonic plate boundaries and different types of seismic waves generated by earthquakes.

This 1-hr coding activity focuses on building scientific instruments that visualize seismic activity!


Evidence for
Plate Tectonics


The original conjectures concerning plate tectonics were based on circumstantial evidence like the shapes of continents being such that they would fit well if pushed together. Today, we have a much broader set of evidence in favor of the hypothesis.

Indications of Tectonic Activity

Among the classes of evidence for continental drift and the underlying plate tectonics we may list

Which two pieces of evidence does not support plate tectonic?

  1. The shapes of many continents are such that they look like they are separated pieces of a jig-saw puzzle. For example, look in the adjacent map at the shape of the east coast of North and South Americal relative to the shape of the west coast of Africa and Europe.

  2. Many fossil comparisons along the edges of continents that look like they fit together suggest species similarities that would only make sense if the two continents were joined at some point in the past.

  3. There is a large amount of seismic, volcanic, and geothermal activity along the conjectured plate boundaries. This is shown clearly below in the figure labeled "Crustal plate boundaries" where the epicenters of earthquakes above Richter magnitude 5.0 are plotted for a 10-year period. The concentration is striking, and indeed this plot serves to define the plate boundaries extremely well. Here is a clickable map of current volcanic activity on Earth.

  4. There are ridges, such as the Mid-Atlantic Ridge (see figures above and below) where plates are separating that are produced by lava welling up from between the plates as they pull apart. Likewise, there are mountain ranges being formed where plates are pushing against each other (e.g., the Himalayas, which are still growing).
Plate tectonic motion, which may be only centimeters per century, is now being studied by careful laser ranging techniques that are capable of detecting such small motions.

Age of the Sea Floor

If the crustal plates are pulling apart at boundaries like the Mid-Atlantic Ridge (see the line of earthquake epicenters down the center of the Atlantic in the preceding figure), the sea floor near these ridges should be very young geologically, since it is formed of material upwelling from the interior. This is indeed the case, as the following figure shows.

Which two pieces of evidence does not support plate tectonic?
Age of the sea floor crustal plates

This figure displays the estimated age of sea floor crustal plates with red the youngest and blue the oldest. Click (here) to a different map with more legible writing and more info. One can see clearly that material near the crustal boundaries is very young geologically.

The evidence for Plate Tectonics is very conclusive.  It is a very well supported theory, and while scientific debate continues about small parts or local effects, the overall concept is accepted as good as fact.

So what are the pieces of evidence?

Shape of continents

From almost the creation of the first true maps of the Earth, people started seeing how continents would be able to fit together.  In particular, people noticed that South America fits almost exactly into Africa.

You should be aware that while world maps were around early in the 1600’s and better defined by the end of the 1700’s, those maps were not ‘public’ but were treated as state secrets.  And so it was not till much later that the broader ‘science’ community had access to good quality and accurate world maps.

It is now known that most of the major continental masses can be fit together in a jigsaw process.   In fact, we now know that the continents were indeed once all joined together as one landmass – the supercontinent of Pangaea.

If you look at most world maps you will ponder how this is evidence, as the continents really don’t appear to ‘fit’ together very well.  What you need to understand is that the vast majority of maps are drawn using a map projection that has the north and south poles (which are points) are a line the width of the map at the top and bottom.  This means that the map distorts the true shape of the Earth’s land and oceans as you love closer to the poles.    Some other map projections distort less, but have the map shape looking like segments of an orange.  See here for a range of map projections.  Check out the way Greenland changes size in each!

What is more remarkable, is the next piece of evidence when added to the shape of continents.

Location of mountains and fossils

What is remarkable, when you reassemble all the continents together, the ancient mountain ranges (many now eroded to their cores) and the location of rock types and fossils all match up.

Which two pieces of evidence does not support plate tectonic?

Earthquakes and Volcanoes

As you can imagine, if plates that are made up of huge slabs of rock are grinding past or under each other, then those would be the places where the vast majority of earthquakes would take place.   If we map the location of all the earthquakes recorded over time, almost all of them occur along what we recognize as plate boundaries.

Likewise, the exception of special volcanoes called hot spots (see below), all of the active volcanoes on Earth are found on some of the boundaries between plates.

Which two pieces of evidence does not support plate tectonic?

In this diagram, we see the Aleutian area off North America.   The black dots and circles represent recorded earthquakes.   You can see they form a zone.  Look above and below the zone, and there are almost none.   So the earthquakes define the boundary.  Not only that, they show that earthquakes are shallow in depth on the southern side of the zone getting deeper and deeper as you go northwards.   This is because the Pacific Plate to the south is being forced under the North American Plate in the north.  As it is forced under it is getting deeper and deeper until it finally melts into the underlying mantle.

The red triangles are active volcanoes.  They also follow the earthquake pattern but are found on the far side of the zone, along with the deep earthquakes.

Hot Spot Volcanoes

Deep in the Earth, possibly at the boundary between the outer crust and the mantle, some form of disturbance funnels vast heat up towards the Earth’s surface in places we call Hot Spots.  These Hot Spots are localized intense zones that can melt the overlying crust and form a volcano.

Because the Hot Spot is completely independent of what is happening with the crust, the resulting volcanoes are not related to the position of the plates.  So many hot spot volcanoes occur nowhere near a boundary.

But what is more significant is that when the plate moves away from the hotspot, the hot spot volcano no longer has the heat and becomes extinct.  The new area of plate above the hot spot then melts and a new volcano is formed.   So we end up with a chain of volcanoes, the active volcano over the hotspot and the remains of volcanoes getting older and older as you move away from the hot spot.

The Hawaiian Islands are an example of this hot spot phenomenon.  The most active volcano, Kilauea, is above the hotspot, and the volcanoes moving north-west get older and older.  The largest of these still stick out of the ocean, but many more remnants of volcanoes that are now further away from the hot spot and most are under the ocean surface.

Which two pieces of evidence does not support plate tectonic?

Because we know the age of the rocks on each of these old volcanoes, and we know how far away they are from the hot spot, we can calculate how fast the crustal plate is moving over the hotspot.  In Hawaii’s case, the Pacific Plate on which the island sit is moving towards the north-west at around 10 cm a year.

Check out the STEM on an Active Volcanoes resource (video, teacher notes and classroom activities)

Other hotspots exist around the globe which can give us the speeds of other plates.

Which two pieces of evidence does not support plate tectonic?
Get a FREE plate tectonics activity called “Rocks of Ages”.   Your students will be calculating the speed of the Pacific plate as it moves over the Hawaiian Hotspot.

Go here to get the activity.

Don’t miss a thing!   Join our email list.

Support what I do to help you…


For more of our blogs on Plate Tectonics see these posts:

Which two pieces of evidence does not support plate tectonic?

Structure of Earth

Have your students summarize the basic structure of the Earth - crust, mantle, outer core, and inner core - on ...
Read More

Which two pieces of evidence does not support plate tectonic?

Rocks of Ages

Description : Student activity where they calculate the speed of a moving tectonic plate by using the ages of rocks ...
Read More

What are the 2 pieces of evidence that support plate tectonics?

Evidence from fossils, glaciers, and complementary coastlines helps reveal how the plates once fit together. Fossils tell us when and where plants and animals once existed.

What are 5 evidences that support the theory of plate tectonics?

Magma generation, igneous intrusions, metamorphism, volcanic action, earthquakes, faulting, and folding are usually the result of plate tectonic activity.

What supports plate tectonics?

The theory of plate tectonics has several supporting pieces of evidence from fossils, rock layers, and complementary coastlines. Fossilized organisms can be found on separate continents.

What are the four main pieces of evidence for plate tectonics?

They based their idea of continental drift on several lines of evidence: fit of the continents, paleoclimate indicators, truncated geologic features, and fossils.