Why is free trade bad for developing countries

During your trial you will have complete digital access to FT.com with everything in both of our Standard Digital and Premium Digital packages.

Standard Digital includes access to a wealth of global news, analysis and expert opinion. Premium Digital includes access to our premier business column, Lex, as well as 15 curated newsletters covering key business themes with original, in-depth reporting. For a full comparison of Standard and Premium Digital, click here.

Change the plan you will roll onto at any time during your trial by visiting the “Settings & Account” section.

What happens at the end of my trial?

If you do nothing, you will be auto-enrolled in our premium digital monthly subscription plan and retain complete access for AU$75 per month.

For cost savings, you can change your plan at any time online in the “Settings & Account” section. If you’d like to retain your premium access and save 20%, you can opt to pay annually at the end of the trial.

You may also opt to downgrade to Standard Digital, a robust journalistic offering that fulfils many user’s needs. Compare Standard and Premium Digital here.

Any changes made can be done at any time and will become effective at the end of the trial period, allowing you to retain full access for 4 weeks, even if you downgrade or cancel.

Free trade agreements are treaties that regulate the tariffs, taxes, and duties that countries impose on their imports and exports. The most well-known U.S. regional trade agreement is the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) which replaced the North America Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) effective July 1, 2020.

The advantages and disadvantages of free trade agreements affect jobs, business growth, and living standards.

Key Takeaways

• Free trade agreements are contracts between countries to allow access to their markets.
• FTAs can force local industries to become more competitive and rely less on government subsidies.
• They can open new markets, increase gross domestic product (GDP), and invite new investments.
• FTAs can open up a country to degradation of natural resources, loss of traditional livelihoods, and local employment issues.
• Countries must balance the domestic benefits of free trade agreements with their consequences.

Advantages of Free Trade Agreements

Free trade agreements are designed to increase trade between two or more countries. Increased international trade has the following six main advantages.

Increased Economic Growth

In 2003, the U.S. International Trade Commission estimated that NAFTA could increase U.S. economic growth by 0.1% to 0.5% per year. The USMCA is a modern trade agreement that recognizes the influence of technology on economies. It changed many original NAFTA rules and processes but also kept others intact.

According to a 2019 report, USMCA is expected to raise GDP by $68.2 billion (0.35%) and employment by 176,000 jobs (0.12%), with a likely positive impact on all broad industry sectors in its first five years.

More Dynamic Business Climate

Without free trade agreements, countries often protected their domestic industries and businesses. This protection often made them stagnant and non-competitive on the global market. With the protection removed, they became motivated to become true global competitors.

Note

Free trade agreements also contribute to foreign investment. Investors will flock to the country. This adds capital to expand local industries and boost domestic businesses. It also brings in U.S. dollars to many formerly isolated countries.

Lower Government Spending

Many governments subsidize local industries. After the trade agreement removes subsidies, those funds can be put to better use.

Industry Expertise

Global companies have more expertise than domestic companies to develop local resources. That's especially true in mining, oil drilling, and manufacturing. Free trade agreements allow global firms access to these business opportunities. When the multinationals partner with local firms to develop the resources, they train them in the best practices. That gives local firms access to these new methods.

Technology Transfer

Local companies also receive access to the latest technologies from their multinational partners. As local economies grow, so do job opportunities. Multinational companies provide job training to local employees.

Disadvantages of Free Trade Agreements

The biggest criticism of free trade agreements is that they are responsible for job outsourcing. Here are some of the primary disadvantages.

Increased Job Outsourcing

Why does this happen? Reducing tariffs on imports allows companies to expand to other countries. Without tariffs, imports from countries with a low cost of living cost less. It makes it difficult for U.S. companies in those same industries to compete, so they may reduce their workforce. Many U.S. manufacturing industries did lay off workers as a result of NAFTA. ​​​​One of the biggest criticisms of NAFTA is that it sent jobs to Mexico.

The USMCA sought to address and correct these criticisms, requiring—for the first time in a trade agreement—that 40% to 45% of North American auto content be made by workers earning at least $16 per hour.

Theft of Intellectual Property

Many developing countries don't have laws to protect patents, inventions, and new processes. The laws they do have aren't always strictly enforced. As a result, corporations often have their ideas stolen. They must then compete with lower-priced domestic knock-offs.

Crowding Out Domestic Industries

Many emerging markets are traditional economies that rely on farming for most employment. These small family farms can't compete with subsidized agri-businesses in developed countries. As a result, they lose their farms and must look for work in the cities. This aggravates unemployment, crime, and poverty.

Poor Working Conditions

Multinational companies may outsource jobs to emerging market countries without adequate labor protections. As a result, women and children are often subjected to grueling factory jobs in sub-standard conditions.

Reduced Tax Revenue

Many smaller countries struggle to replace revenue lost from import tariffs and fees.

Degradation of Natural Resources

Emerging market countries often don't have many environmental protections. Free trade leads to the depletion of timber, minerals, and other natural resources. Deforestation and strip mining reduce their jungles and fields to wastelands.

Note

In addition to threatening environmental resources, free trade agreements threaten native populations as well. As development moves into isolated areas, indigenous cultures can be destroyed. Local peoples are uprooted. Many suffer disease and death when their resources are polluted.

How To Create Effective Trade Agreements

Free trade agreements are designed to combat trade protectionism, which has its own downsides. Trade protectionism produces high tariffs and only protects domestic industries in the short term. In the long term, global corporations will hire the cheapest workers wherever they are in the world to make higher profits.

A better solution than protectionism is the inclusion of regulations within trade agreements that protect against the disadvantages.

Note

Environmental safeguards can prevent the destruction of natural resources and cultures. Labor laws prevent poor working conditions. The World Trade Organization enforces free trade agreement regulations.

Developed economies can reduce their agribusiness subsidies, keeping emerging market farmers in business. They can help local farmers develop sustainable practices. They can then market them as such to consumers who value that.

Countries can insist that foreign companies build local factories as part of the agreement. They can require these companies to share technology and train local workers.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

What was the purpose of NAFTA?

NAFTA was created to promote cross-border trade among the U.S., Mexico, and Canada. The three countries sought to create a free trade agreement that would foster competition, increase investment opportunities, and create procedures for handling trade disputes. Although it had some serious downsides, NAFTA largely succeeded in achieving those goals. The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) officially replaced NAFTA on July 1, 2020, to achieve the modern trade goals of the digital age.

What is the difference between free trade and fair trade?

Although these terms are often confused, there are significant differences between free trade and fair trade. Free trade agreements are aimed at fostering open trade between nations to improve economic growth among all involved parties. The fair trade movement is focused on fostering economic equity on a global scale so that the workers who make goods in other countries receive fair wages and improve their lives and communities.

Was this page helpful?

Thanks for your feedback!

Tell us why!

Sources

The Balance uses only high-quality sources, including peer-reviewed studies, to support the facts within our articles. Read our editorial process to learn more about how we fact-check and keep our content accurate, reliable, and trustworthy.

1. Office of the United States Trade Representative. "United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement."

2. United States International Trade Commission. "The Impact of Trade Agreements: Effect of the Tokyo Round, U.S.-Israel FTA, U.S.-Canada FTA, NAFTA, and the Uruguay Round on the U.S. Economy," Page 32.

3. New York City Economic Development Corporation. "USMCA and Its Impacts on NYC's Economy."

4. United States International Trade Commission. "U.S.-Mexico-Canada Trade Agreement: Likely Impact on the U.S. Economy and on Specific Industry Sectors," Page 43.

5. Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business. "Trade and Technology Within the Free Trade Zone: The Impact of the WTO Agreement, NAFTA, and Tax Treaties on the NAFTA Signatories," Page 84.

6. Congressional Research Service. "The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)," Page 27.

7. Congressional Research Service. "The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA)," Page 11.

8. Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business. "Trade and Technology Within the Free Trade Zone: The Impact of the WTO Agreement, NAFTA, and Tax Treaties on the NAFTA Signatories," Page 72.

9. ADB Institute. "Exploring the Trade-Urbanization Nexus in Developing Economies: Evidence and Implications" Pages 2, 7-13.

10. Brookings Institution. "Workers' Rights: Labor Standards and Global Trade."

11. European Union Directorate-General for External Policies. "Addressing Developing Countries' Challenges in Free Trade Implementation," Page 8.

12. World Trade Organization. "World Trade Report 2010: D. Trade Policies and Natural Resources," Pages 126, 134, 136.

13. American University International Law Review. "Indigenous Peoples, Indigenous Farmers: NAFTA's Threat to Mexican Teosinte Farmers and What Can Be Done About It," Page 1393.

    Why are developing countries opposed to free trade?

    Free trade is bad for the environment The rigorous exploitation leads to a depletion of resources, which has severe negative long-term effects on the local environment. It also means that the resources are no longer available for the local population, leading to negative impacts on the local economy.

    What are the disadvantages of free trade in developing country?

    The disadvantages are twofold. If FTAs are not set up within the right framework of policies, they can diminish rather than enhance economic welfare. The second disadvantage is that they are not good vehicles for liberalising trade in sectors on which parties outside the agreement have a major influence.

    How does free trade affect developing countries?

    Improved Production Efficiency Developing countries can use free trade to improve their production efficiency. Most nations are capable of producing some type of goods or service. However, a lack of knowledge or proper resources can make production inefficient or ineffective.

    What are the negative effects of free trade?

    However, free trade can have negative consequences, such as (i) the use of cheap labour (lower pay and low to no social taxes), (ii) higher pollution due to lower regulations, and (iii) undeclared government subsidies such as cheap financing, free land, tariffs on imports, or tax waivers.