What country has the most dangerous animals

There are some 400 wolves in Sweden. The wolf is protected and may not be killed unless there are risks for repeated attacks on life or property. The wolf feeds mainly on the moose.

The wolverine (Gulo gulo) is primarily a scavenger. There are around 650 wolverines in Sweden. When stressed or followed, the wolverine secrets a skunk-like odour.

There are around 1,250 lynx (Lynx lynx) in Sweden. It feeds mainly on reindeer or deer. Starvation is the most common cause of death among the young.

As far as anyone knows, the lynx and wolverine have never hurt a human being in Sweden. Ever.

Even though the wolf feeds on certain animals larger than itself, the last recorded wolf attack on humans in the wild happened in 1821. On that occasion, the wolf that attacked had been born in captivity and later released.

But the bear has been known to attack – and even kill – humans in modern times. 

According to De 5 Stora – the Large Carnivore Centre, an information centre about Sweden's five largest carnivores – 61 persons were involved in aggressive/threatening bear incidents during 1977–2019 (link in Swedish). A majority of these happened during hunts. It turns out bears actually prefer to eat blueberries.

People’s fears are difficult if not impossible to put to an end. Benny Gäfvert of the Large Carnivore Centre says: ‘Myths about predators start to build from an early age, through children’s books and tales. These animals have also had a historical impact on human lives that is still on-going.’ The historical impact he refers to is mainly about livestock, which is the main reason our predators remain controversial and a continued cause for debate: what is a healthy number of predators in a country like Sweden?

‘I am convinced that Sweden will be home to large predators even in the distant future’, Gäfvert says. ‘All sides on the debate have a consensus when it comes to the preservation of large predators, from hunters to conservationists. The only question is how big a population.’

©Jack Reynolds-Moment Open/Getty Images

Even more than for its gorgeous opera house, sandy beaches, or colourful reefs, Australia has cemented its reputation as home to some of the world’s deadliest animals. Or, if you believe the rumours, maybe even all of the world’s deadliest animals.

The numbers tell a different story. It is estimated that Australia hosts 66 venomous species, ranking beneath countries such as Brazil (with 79 species) and Mexico (with 80). But if it’s the amount of venom in those creatures that counts—which is certainly the case if you find yourself bitten or stung by one—Australia’s most-deadly status starts to make more sense. Its inland taipan snakes, box jellyfish, Sydney funnel-web spiders, and stonefish all rank among the most venomous of their kind.

The best illustration of Australia’s deadly-animal problem may be the Elapidae snake family: a venomous group characterized by its short fangs and agile nature. Out of 300 elapid species, which include the taipan, coral snake, and mamba, 60 can be found across the land and waters of Australia. Some are small and shy around humans, while others are large and obtrusive. Striking with a downward stabbing motion, elapids kill by injecting a neurotoxic venom that causes immediate paralysis in prey. Once bitten, a prey animal—which for an elapid may include rodents, small birds, and even other snakes—is unable to escape being completely devoured. The venom released by one bite of a taipan is, if given the chance, enough to kill 250,000 mice.

The reason why almost all Australian snakes are venomous is that almost all of them are elapids. Researchers use the theory of continental drift, which posits that Earth’s continents once experienced a large-scale movement away from one another, to interpret the lineage of this dangerous population. When landmasses separated, it is likely that Australia’s snake population was entirely venomous. Although other continents retained populations of venomous and nonvenomous snakes after the continental drift, resulting in a diverse snake population today, Australia’s modern-day snakes share purely venomous ancestors—a heritage resulting in the most toxic group of snakes on the planet.

But while Australia is home to some of the deadliest creatures on the planet (we haven’t even gone into detail about the Sydney funnel-web spider, whose bite releases a neurotoxin that can kill a child in only 15 minutes), that doesn’t mean Australia is actually the deadliest continent. Contact with its venomous inhabitants is, in reality, incredibly rare. With the development of antivenins to combat different species’ toxins, deaths from such a bite or sting are even rarer. Of the 41,000 people hospitalized as a result of a venomous bite or sting from 2000 to 2013, only 64 victims lost their lives.

Of course, it’s not only venomous species that can be lethal. Sharks have no venom, nor do cassowaries, which are considered perhaps the most dangerous birds in the world, thanks to the daggerlike nails on two of their six toes. Though both animals are common in Australia or its surrounding waters and are considered threatening, aggression toward humans from either is still relatively rare. On average, shark attacks historically have claimed fewer than one victim per year, with nonfatal attacks ranging anywhere from 8 to 19 per year between 2011 and 2020. Though cassowaries are more likely to engage with humans, attacking more than 200 people per year, only one cassowary-related death has occurred since the 1920s.

Does Australia deserve its deadly reputation? Certainly. Especially when compared with the creatures of other continents, Australia’s animals possess an uncanny ability to kill. But will an encounter with an Australian animal kill you? Unless you hunt down an inland taipan in its remote desert home and provoke it, probably not. Though science has not yet revealed why the Sydney funnel-web spider needs to be so venomous, visitors to the continent can rest easy in the knowledge that an antivenin for its bite exists, so a hairy spider face won’t be the last thing they ever see.

What country has the most dangerous animals
New from Britannica

What country has the most dangerous animals

Two Oregon settlers flipped a coin to decide whose hometown would be used to name their village. Had the man from Portland, Maine, not won, Oregon’s biggest city would now be named Boston.

See All Good Facts

What country has the most dangerous animals

Map by reddit user lanson15

Which country has the most venomous animals? Surprisingly, it’s not Australia but Mexico with 80, followed by Brazil with 79 and then Australia with just 66 (they just happen to be more potent). So how is venomous defined here?

Reddit user lanson15 used the Living Hazards Database from the Armed Forces Pest Management Board, which “… is a comprehensive compilation of more than 500 species worldwide, which are reported to cause serious injury or death of humans.”

In addition to the top 3 countries above, Colombia, India, Indonesia and Vietnam all have over 50 different species apiece. Europe, Central Asia and Canada are at the other extreme, with fewer than 10 species per country. And if you’re wondering about France, it’s because it includes French Guiana, which is considered an overseas department of France.

Generally speaking warmer places have more venomous species than colder places, although there are some interesting exceptions to this rule such as the Caribbean, Western Sahara, Madagascar, Bhutan and Lesotho, to name a few.

So if you make your travel plans based around how likely you are to get bitten by a snake or spider, you now have a map of which countries to visit and which to avoid.

Wonder how this looks in the United States:

What country has the most dangerous animals

Map by reddit user lanson15

Similar to the global trend, warmer Southern States have more venomous species than North States. Arizona is the clear winner (or loser) with over 30 species.

Want to learn more about venomous animals? Then have a look at the following books:

Would you avoid a country because it had too many venomous animals? Tell us in the comment section below: