Which of the following is a more effective strategy for traveling from one place to another in the shortest period of time: (1) adding miles to your trip by driving the back streets of a city to avoid traffic jams; or (2) taking the shortest, most direct route even if it means sitting on a freeway so congested that you only move a few miles an hour? And which approach burns more gas and places more wear and tear on your car: the frequent starting and stopping of city driving or highway driving at a constant rate of speed? Show This scenario provides a rough analogy of how the human body responds to different types of cardiorespiratory exercise. High-intensity interval training (HIIT), which, in this scenario, could be considered similar to city driving, can be extremely effective for burning calories and improving aerobic capacity but at the expense of placing high levels of physical stress on the body. Conversely, steady-state training (SST) focuses on maintaining a consistent, low-to-moderate intensity work-rate for an extended period of time, which is comparable to driving on a highway. Like HIIT, SST can be effective for aerobic conditioning and burning calories, but it can require an extensive amount of time to do the volume of work necessary to achieve the desired results. So, is one form of training better than the other? Like almost all fitness-related questions, the answer depends on a variety of factors. In the car analogy described above, both options can help you get to your destination. Which one you choose depends on your personal preference—would you prefer to sit in slow-moving traffic or being in constant motion? The following table lists the features, advantages, and disadvantages of HIIT vs. steady state cardio. There is a large body of research validating each mode as an effective form of exercise; however, it is up to you to determine which one is best suited to help your clients reach their fitness goals in the shortest period of time. Steady-state TrainingFeatures
Advantages
Disadvantages
Interval TrainingFeatures
Advantages
Disadvantages
5 Reasons Why HIIT Might Be the Best Choice (for You or Your Clients)
5 Reasons Why Steady-state Training Might Be the Best Choice (for You or Your Clients)
Regardless of whether you choose SST or HIIT, to keep seeing results it’s important to change workouts on a regular basis to keep from becoming complacent, which could result in getting stuck on a plateau and not achieving any results from the exercise program. The best workout program is the one that is done on a regular basis.
Are you seeking a new cardio routine? Guidelines from various leading health and fitness organization tell us we need to participate in cardio activities five times a week for a total of 150 minutes if we plan to exercise at moderate intensities; or three times a week for a total of 75 minutes if we plan to exercise at vigorous intensities; or some combination of both (1). But how do we define and distinguish moderate from vigorous intensity? Unfortunately, this is where these same guidelines become murky as they provide a variety of complicated and inconsistent methods to distinguish the two. Common Errors in Prescribing Cardio Programs Many of us are familiar with the guideline that recommends an intensity that reflects a percentage of your maximal heart rate (HRmax) – calculated mathematically by subtracting your age from 220 (i.e., 220-Age). For example a 35-year old person would have an estimated HRmax of 185 beats per minute (220-35 = 185). If this person wants to train at 70% intensity she should keep her heart rate at 130 beats per minute (185 × 70% = 130). However, this formula was never intended to be used as an instrument for designing cardiorespiratory fitness programs because maximal heart rate varies significantly among individuals of the same age. Estimating maximal heart rate from mathematical formulas can produce results that are ±10 to 12 beats per minute off the actual maximal heart rate (2). Ironically, although this guideline still exists on most pieces of cardio equipment, and is still referenced in many publications, the latest exercise guidelines now tell us to no longer use this formula given its inaccuracies as an intensity guide (1). We are also told that the duration of each cardio bout should be at least 10-minutes in length to be beneficial. Does that mean that a 5-minute bout of exercise is essentially worthless? The answer is absolutely no as new research now demonstrates that even as little as four minutes of exercise may offer some positive benefits, especially for those individuals just beginning an activity program (3). Furthermore, we are also told that our aerobic program should follow the FITT-VP principle that represents frequency, intensity, type, time, volume, pattern and progression; with each principle involving various and sometimes complicated scientific guidelines (1). Confused? Understandably so, but what if we simplified the entire process so that you could develop your own personalized cardio program that is based on science, but easy to use and follow?
The advantages of the VIP program lie in its simplicity, flexibility, ownership or accountability assumed with developing your program and controlling your progression, and its personalization – in that it is built around what you can do or desire to do rather than what you feel you need to do. Now that you are armed with this new tool, NASM challenges you to build your own program, and kick start your plan for a healthier new you. References:
|