How much does a can of tuna weigh in grams

Published Nov. 12, 1998|Updated Sep. 14, 2005

Paul E. Brefka, who eats tuna fish at least once a week for lunch, says he recently noticed that the cans seemed to contain more water and less tuna.

An inventor and product designer who is curious by nature, Brefka got out his scale and decided to check how much fish was actually in a 6-ounce can. What he found surprised him.

He tested two cans of Geisha tuna fish and found slightly less than 4 ounces of tuna in each can. He wrote Geisha's corporate parent two complaint letters but never received a response.

When he called us, we decided to put six major brands of solid white tuna on Brefka's scale. The results were troubling. Every can was the same size, but the tuna fish-to-water ratio in each can varied considerably from brand to brand.

Geisha, for example, had the most water and least fish, 3.8 ounces. Chicken of the Sea had the most tuna fish _ 5.1 ounces _ and least water. Bumblebee, StarKist, 3 Diamonds and Stop and Shop's private label brand ranged between 4.1 and 4.5 ounces of tuna fish.

"Everyone I've talked to is amazed at this," said Brefka. "They all look at that label that says "net weight 6 ounces' and expect they're getting 6 ounces of tuna."

Actually, the net weight amount currently includes water. The only real help the consumer gets in determining how much tuna fish is actually in a tuna fish can comes with the serving size information. The standard serving size for tuna fish is 2 ounces drained of all liquid. The manufacturers say their 6-ounce can has about 2.5 servings, or 5 drained ounces of tuna.

Yet, according to Brefka's scale, all of the manufacturers except Chicken of the Sea had less than 5 ounces of tuna in their cans. The shortages ranged from a high of 1.2 ounces with Geisha to a low of a half ounce with StarKist.

It's not much in each instance, but it adds up quickly. Americans buy about 2.2-billion 6-ounce cans of tuna fish each year, according to the U.S. Tuna Foundation.

Brefka also weighed a couple of 12-ounce cans of solid white tuna fish for us and found at least 9 ounces in each of them. That was still less than should have been in the cans, according to the serving-size information, but it was a better deal than the 6-ounce cans.

For example, two 6-ounce cans of 3 Diamonds in our test cost a total of $2.18 and yielded 8.8 ounces of tuna fish. A single 12-ounce can of 3 Diamonds cost $2.09 and yielded 9.2 ounces.

Tuna fish canning companies questioned the accuracy of Brefka's weighing methods. Indeed, he did not follow Food and Drug Administration guidelines for weighing tuna fish. The guidelines run three pages, are as impenetrable as IRS instructions and require special equipment for removing the water.

However, from what we saw, Brefka was far more meticulous than a typical consumer would be. He was careful in draining the water, and his scale was precise.

Debbie Bolding, general manager of communications at StarKist Foods, the No. 1 tuna fish seller in the United States, said her company believes that its cans are in full compliance with the law, but she said StarKist would gladly replace any can that has less than 5 ounces in it.

David Burney, executive director of the U.S. Tuna Foundation, said the industry has been trying for three years to persuade the FDA to approve labels that more accurately describe the contents of a can. He said the "net weight 6 ounces" reference on the current labels causes all sorts of problems.

"It's very confusing for us, for the FDA, and for the consumer," Burney said.

Indeed, an FDA spokeswoman initially told us that a can of tuna fish with the words "net weight 6 ounces" on the label should contain 6 ounces of tuna fish. She later backed away from that statement, saying a law enacted in the early 1970s allowed tuna fish companies to include water in the net weight.

A second law enacted in 1990 set forth standard serving sizes for every product and required manufacturers to disclose how many of those serving sizes were in each container.

The FDA, at the urging of the tuna industry, has now proposed new regulations that would require the net weight information to be based on drained weight and to match the serving size amount. In other words, tuna fish cans in the future will probably say "net weight 5 ounces." Let's hope that's how much tuna fish is actually in there.

Readers have shared plenty of stories about the lashings of liquid and scant solids in their canned food, wondering if they were being ripped off. So we decided to get to the bottom of this (ahem) can-undrum.

We took five popular canned food categories – tuna, corn, peaches, chick peas and beetroot – and drained the liquid and weighed the solid contents to compare our findings with what's on the label.

On this page:

  • Are the canned food labels accurate?
  • Net weight vs drained weight
  • What's a normal food-to-liquid ratio?
  • Full disclosure in labelling needed
  • Comparing prices: the catch
  • How we tested

Are the canned food labels accurate?

We spot-checked 27 different leading brand and supermarket own-brand canned food products – two samples of each. Only four of the 54 cans we opened contained exactly the amount of food that's labelled – but that's not the bad story it may seem.

  • Four cans contained less food (the largest shortfall we recorded was six percent less – a can of Aldi's New Season Sliced Beetroot). 
  • But 46 of the 54 cans opened – that's 85% – actually contained more food than declared.

How the brands performed

How did the brands compare for delivering the weight promised? There wasn't much in it, but in our spot check:

  • Woolworths consistently over-delivered on the amount of food in the can, with all 16 of the Woolworths' cans (100%) containing more than what's claimed on the label
  • Coles and leading brands (Edgell, Golden Circle, John West, SPC etc.) followed, each with 13 of their 14 cans (93%) containing the same as or more than what's labelled
  • Aldi (eight of 10, 80%) brought up the rear.

How the food types compared

And out of the four types of food we tested:

  • corn kernels were most consistent with their labels, with all cans measuring within nine percent of the labelled quantity
  • sliced beetroot, on the other hand, varied from six percent under to a whopping 22% over the labelled quantity (in a can of Coles Australian Sliced Beetroot)
  • chickpeas, corn and peaches all contained the same as or more than the labelled quantity
  • we recorded a shortfall in a couple of cans each of tuna and beetroot.

Net weight vs drained weight

net weight labelling

Net weight includes both solids and liquid.

It appears that cans have a tendency to contain more food rather than less than what's labelled. 

Why then do people feel they're being ripped off?

Part of the problem could be that the weight that's labelled on the front of the can isn't telling the whole story. The label states the net weight, which is the weight of the contents (both solids and liquid) minus the packaging. So for foods packaged with liquid, the weight of the food alone isn't going to be the same as – and may not even be close to – the weight on the label.

percentage ingredients label

Percentage of food in ingredients list.

It appears that cans have a tendency to contain more food rather than less than what's labelled. 

Why then do people feel they're being ripped off?

Part of the problem could be that the weight that's labelled on the front of the can isn't telling the whole story. The label states the net weight, which is the weight of the contents (both solids and liquid) minus the packaging. So for foods packaged with liquid, the weight of the food alone isn't going to be the same as – and may not even be close to – the weight on the label.

If you're likely to consume both the food and the liquid – canned tomatoes or sliced peaches, for example  – then this isn't really an issue. But there are many types of canned food where you'll likely drain off and discard the liquid – think tuna in spring water, corn kernels or chickpeas –  and there's currently no requirement in Australia for manufacturers to label the drained weight of food in cans. 

To find out how much food you'll be getting before you open the can, you need to:

  1. check the percentage labelling in the ingredients list
  2. do your own calculations based on the net weight to work out the drained weight.

What's a normal food-to-liquid ratio?

The liquid, or 'packing medium', in a can (water, oil, vinegar or juice for example) is there for protecting and/or flavouring the food. And the amount of liquid, and therefore food, varies. 

  • The chickpeas in our test contained the most liquid, with cans containing just 59% chickpeas on average across the cans opened. 
  • The cans of tuna chunks, on the other hand, contained the least liquid, averaging 71% tuna across the cans we opened. A can of tuna that's two-thirds full, as Renata repeatedly got, is not unusual.

Across all the different cans we tested we found the percentage of food inside ranged from 56% (several cans of chickpeas) up to 79% (a can of tuna), with a total of 65% food on average.

When one third of what you're paying for is liquid – often a liquid you'll be discarding before eating – it's not surprising some people feel they're not getting their money's worth.

Full disclosure in labelling needed

NIP drained info

Nutrition information provided based on drained weight.

For foods that are intended to be drained before consumption, the food standards code requires the quantities in the nutrition information panel to reflect the food 'as drained'. This makes sense, as you're only going to be interested in what you'll actually eat, not what you'll be pouring down the sink. But you could argue the same for the weight labelled on the front.

While you can calculate the drained weight yourself, CHOICE thinks that if nutrition information is based on it, then the drained weight should be given on the label too. That way, consumers can see at a glance what they'll actually be getting in the way of both nutrition and food content. This is particularly important considering there are implications when comparing prices.

Comparing prices: the catch

Comparing the unit price between two brands, or sizes, of the same product is how you can work out which is the best value. The unit price is the price per 100g or 100mL of the food you're buying. 

But unit price is based on the net weight of the contents minus the packaging, which in the case of food in a liquid includes the liquid content as well.

This allows for a fair comparison if the products you're comparing contain the same percentage of food, but not so when the percentage of food varies – particularly if you're going to be discarding the liquid.

canned tuna liquid

Some canned tuna contains more liquid than others.

Take tuna chunks in spring water, for example.

The labelled tuna content of the cans in our spot check (all with a net weight of 95g) ranged from 65% to 74%. Ranked from least to most expensive, we get a different order depending on whether the unit price is based on net weight or drained weight.

So if you're trying to find the best deal and you're choosing food that's intended to be drained, check that the percentage food is the same in the products you're comparing.

Best-value tuna by drained weight
Brand Labelled tuna
%
$/100g netCheapest
net
$/100g drainedCheapest
 drained
Woolworths 74 0.84  1 1.14  1
Coles 70 0.84  1 1.20  2
Portview (Aldi) 74 1.15  3 1.55  3
John West 65 1.05  2 1.62  4
Greenseas 65 2.11  4 3.24  5

How we tested

canned corn kernels draining in sieve

We tested corn, beetroot, chickpeas, peaches and tuna.

  • Cans were opened and the contents poured and distributed evenly across a flat sieve with a square mesh of 2.36mm. 
  • The sieve was tilted to facilitate draining, and allowed to drain for two minutes. 
  • The weight of the sieve and bowl was recorded prior to and in combination with weighing each can's contents, and drained weight was calculated from these figures.

Stock images: Getty, unless otherwise stated.

How much tuna is in a can in grams?

On the nutrition facts panel on a can of tuna, a serving size is usually 56 grams, which is 1/4 cup or 2 ounces.

How much does a can of tuna weigh?

A standard US can of tuna weighs 5oz (142g), including added liquid, usually water, oil, or brine. The average drained tuna weight of a 5oz can is 4oz (113g), and half a can of this size weighs 2oz (57g) which is classed as one serving.

How much tuna is in a normal can?

Six ounces is the equivalent of an average can of tuna.

How many grams of tuna are in a can of ocean?

Ocean's - Flaked Light Tuna In Water, 170 Gram Canned Flake Light Tuna in Water. Dolphin Friendly.