When employees go above and beyond, it seems logical to reward them. Let your staff know that you appreciate exceptional performance or valuable ideas, and they'll work twice as hard to succeed, right? Sometimes. However, there are drawbacks to incentive plans that can alienate the people under you. Design your program carefully to avoid them.
The obvious advantage of incentives is that they give employees a reason to do their best. Some employees don't need an extra push to be outstanding. Others may have the talent but no drive to use it. If they know applying themselves generates serious rewards, underachievers can turn into star performers.
Employees who do their best and still don't qualify for incentives may become resentful of the star performers. Some workers find the rewards a disincentive. When they see they can't compete, they give up, and their performance suffers.
If you substitute an incentive scheme for part of their pay, the action can alienate your staff. From the perspective of workers who don't qualify for the bonuses, you've imposed a pay cut. This can cause people to undermine their co-workers' efforts, rather than focusing on their own goals.
People like to feel they're in control of their careers. Giving employees the opportunity to earn more if they achieve more can give them that feeling. Job satisfaction increases, which encourages them to stay with the company.
According to Gretchen Rubin, author of the Happiness Project, people are happiest when they feel in control of their lives. This is good news for the business, as happy employees tend to work harder and are more productive.
Individual and group incentive plans are easier to apply to some departments than others. If you're in manufacturing, you can tie the incentives to the amount of product made or to minimizing errors. You can reward salespeople for the amount of sales revenue they bring in.
With other workers, it's hard to come up with a metric that works. A newspaper can reward salespeople for above-average advertising income, but how should they incentivize reporters? Number of stories? Length of stories? The relationship between writing and revenue is hard to assess.
Some individual incentive pay plans offer awards to anyone who meets the benchmarks. Others are competitive, limited to a small number of top performers. That competitive aspect gives employees even more of a reason to outperform the rest of their department. However, it can create greater resentment than a regular incentive program can.
A competitive program has to be designed carefully, with clear standards for reaching the winner's circle. If employees think it's unfair or that you're rewarding your favorites rather than the best performers, they may start looking for jobs elsewhere.
Employees who want to earn incentives may do so in ways that hurt the company as a whole. If factory output is the benchmark, workers on the shop floor may prioritize speed and let quality slide. If sales volume is what counts, salespeople may offer customers discounts or deals that eat into your profit margins.
Busch, whose remarks came at a recent BLR-sponsored webinar, is owner of HR Compensation Consultants, LLC. Here are her suggestions about team and individual incentives. What Are Team-Driven Incentives? Team-driven incentive are intended to foster a collaborative environment in which team members are focused on helping one another. They are:
Types of Team-Driven Rewards
Individual Performance Measurements
Are class action lawyers peering at your comp practices? It’s likely, but you can keep them at bay by finding and eliminating any wage and hour violations yourself. Our editors recommend BLR’s easy-to-use FLSA Wage & Hour Self-Audit Guide. Try it for 30 days … on us. Advantages and Disadvantages of Individual Incentives Advantages
Disadvantages
Advantages and Disadvantages of Team Incentives Advantages
Disadvantages
Is there a time and place for both types?
Examples of when team-driven goals may be the way to go instead of individual rewards: Team-Driven
Individual
Team incentives, individual incentives, recalculation of overtime—just a few of the numerous wage and hour challenges all comp pros face. Wage and hour should be simple, but it’s just not. Complying with the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) is one of the most confusing and challenging things comp managers have to do. How can you tell if they are doing it right? There’s only one way to find out what sort of compensation shenanigans are going on—regular audits. To accomplish a successful audit, BLR’s editors recommend a unique checklist-based program called the Wage & Hour Self-Audit Guide. Why are checklists so great? It’s because they’re completely impersonal, and they force you to jump through all the necessary hoops, one by one. They also ensure consistency in how operations are conducted. And that’s vital in compensation, where it’s all too easy to land in court if you discriminate in how you treat one employee over another. Experts say that it’s always better to do your own audit and fix what needs fixing before authorities do their audit. Most employers agree, but they get bogged down in how to start, and in the end, they do nothing. There are, however, aids to making FLSA self-auditing relatively easy. What our editors strongly recommend is BLR’s Wage & Hour Self-Audit Guide. It is both effective and easy to use, and it even won an award for those features. Here’s what customers like about it:
All you need to avoid exempt/nonexempt classification and overtime errors, now in BLR’s award-winning FLSA Wage & Hour Self-Audit Guide. Find out more.
You can examine BLR’s Wage & Hour Self-Audit Guide for up to 30 days at no cost or obligation. Go here and we’ll be glad to arrange it. |