Department of Health. The healthy child Programme: pregnancy and the first five years of life. London: Department of Health; 2009.
Google Scholar
Chief Nursing Officers of England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales. Midwifery 2020: Delivering expectations. London: Author; 2010.
Google Scholar
National Health and Medical Research Council. National Guidance on Collaborative Maternity Care. Available from: https://catalogue.nla.gov.au/Record/5055605. Accessed 7 July 2018.
World Health Organization. Framework for action on interprofessional education & collaborative practice. WHO, Geneva. 2010
Marmot M, Allen J, Goldblatt P, Boyce T, McNeish D, Grady M, Geddes I. Fair society, healthy lives: the Marmot review: The Marmot review; 2010.
Public Health England. Health matters: giving every child the best start in life. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/health-matters-giving-every-child-the-best-start-in-life/health-matters-giving-every-child-the-best-start-in-life. Accessed 7 July 2018.
Hoddinott P, Pill R, Chalmers M. Health professionals, implementation and outcomes: reflections on a complex intervention to improve breastfeeding rates in primary care. Fam Pract. 2007;24(1):84–91.
Article Google Scholar
Public Health England. Health Visiting Programme: Pathway to support professional practice and deliver new service offer: Health visiting and midwifery partnership – pregnancy and early weeks. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/465344/2903819_PHE_Midwifery_accessible.pdf. Accessed 7 July 2018.
Aquino MRJ, Olander EK, Needle J, Bryar R. Midwives’ and health visitors’ collaborative relationships: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016;62:193–206.
Article Google Scholar
Psaila K, Schmied V, Fowler C, Kruske S. Interprofessional collaboration at transition of care: perspectives of child and family health nurses and midwives. J Clin Nurs. 2014;24:160–72.
Article Google Scholar
Schmied V, Mills A, Kruske S, Kemp L, Fowler C, Homer C. The nature and impact of collaboration and integrated service delivery for pregnant women, children and families. J Clin Nurs. 2010;19(23–24):3516–26.
Article Google Scholar
Sandall J, Coxon K, Mackintosh N, Rayment-Jones H, Locock L, Page L. Relationships: the pathway to safe, high-quality maternity care. Report from the Sheila Kitzinger symposium at Green Templeton College October 2015. Oxford: Green Templeton College; 2016.
Penny RA, Windsor C. Collaboration: a critical exploration of the care continuum. Nurs Inq. 2017;24(2):e12164.
Article Google Scholar
Munro S, Kornelsen J, Grzybowski S. Models of maternity care in rural environments: barriers and attributes of interprofessional collaboration with midwives. Midwifery. 2013;29(6):646–52.
Article Google Scholar
Sword W, Heaman MI, Brooks S, Tough S, Janssen PA, Young D, Kingston D, Helewa ME, Akhtar-Danesh N, Hutton E. Women's and care providers’ perspectives of quality prenatal care: a qualitative descriptive study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012;12(1):29.
Article Google Scholar
Pereira Gray DJ, Sidaway-Lee K, White E, Thorne A, Evans PH. Continuity of care with doctors—a matter of life and death? A systematic review of continuity of care and mortality. BMJ Open. 2018;8(6):e021161.
Article Google Scholar
NHS England. Implementing Better Births: Continuity of Carer. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/publication/implementing-better-births-continuity-of-carer/. Accessed 8 July 2018.
Bhaskar R. A realist theory of science. 2nd ed. London: Verso; 1997.
Google Scholar
Clark AM, Lissel SL, Davis C. Complex critical realism: tenets and application in nursing research. Adv Nurs Sci. 2008;31(4):E67–79.
Article Google Scholar
Walsh D, Evans K. Critical realism: an important theoretical perspective for midwifery research. Midwifery. 2014;30(1):1–6.
Article Google Scholar
Fletcher AJ. Applying critical realism in qualitative research: methodology meets method. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2017;20(2):181–94.
Article Google Scholar
D'Amour D, Goulet L, Pineault R, Labadie JF, Remondin M. Comparative study of interorganizational collaboration in four health regions and its impact: the case of perinatal services. Research Report; 2004.
Google Scholar
Barbour R. Doing focus groups: Sage; 2008.
Morgan DL: Focus groups as qualitative research, 16: Sage publications; 1997.
Jacobs CD, Heracleous LT. Constructing shared understanding: the role of embodied metaphors in organization development. J Appl Behav Sci. 2006;42(2):207–26.
Article Google Scholar
Braun V, Carke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
Article Google Scholar
Fereday J, Muir-Cochrane E. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis : a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. Int J Qual Methods. 2006;5:80–92.
Article Google Scholar
International QSR: QSR NVivo for Mac 11.4.1. 2014.
Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. Personal child health record. Available from: https://www.rcpch.ac.uk/resources/personal-child-health-record-pchr. Accessed 7 July 2018.
Care Quality Commission. National findings from the 2013 survey of women’s experiences of maternity care [Internet]. Care Quality Commission [cited 2018 July 7]. Available from: https://www.cqc.org.uk/sites/default/files/20180130_mat17_statisticalrelease.pdf.
Raine R, Cartwright M, Richens Y, Mahamed Z, Smith D. A qualitative study of women’s experiences of communication in antenatal care: identifying areas for action. Matern Child Health J. 2010;14(4):590–9.
Article Google Scholar
Redshaw M, Henderson J. Safely delivered: A national survey of women's experience of maternity care 2014 [Internet]. National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit [cited 2018 July 7]. Available from: https://www.npeu.ox.ac.uk/downloads/files/reports/Safely%20delivered%20NMS%202014.pdf.
NHS Workforce statistics. February 2018. Available from: https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/nhs-workforce-statistics/nhs-workforce-statistics%2D%2D-february-2018. Accessed 7 July 2018.
Statistical commentary. Health visitor service delivery metrics, quarter 2, 2017 to 2018. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/health-visitor-service-delivery-metrics-2017-to-2018/statistical-commentary-health-visitor-service-delivery-metrics-quarter-2-2017-to-2018. Accessed 7 July 2018.
National Maternity Review. Better births: Improving outcomes of maternity services in England. A five year forward view for maternity care. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/national-maternity-review-report.pdf. Accessed 7 July 2018.
Donetto S, Malone M, Hughes J, Morrow E, Cowley S, Maben J. Health visiting: The voice of service users. Available from: https://www.kcl.ac.uk/nursing/research/nnru/publications/Reports/Voice-of-service-user-report-July-2013-FINAL.pdf. Accessed 7 July 2018.
Cheyne H, McCourt C, Semple K. Mother knows best: developing a consumer led, evidence informed, research agenda for maternity care. Midwifery. 2013;29(6):705–12.
Article Google Scholar
Draper J, Farmer S, Field S. The working relationship between the health visitor and community midwife. Health Visitor. 1984;57(12):366–8.
Google Scholar
Psaila K, Schmied V, Fowler C, Kruske S. Discontinuities between maternity and child and family health services: health professional's perceptions. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:4–4.
