Which of the following is a characteristic of phenomenological research methodology?

  1. Cambridge Online Dictionary. 2019. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/research. Accessed 24 Feb 2019, Research.

  2. Bynum W, Artino A, Uijtdehaage S, Webb A, Varpio L. Sentinel emotional events. The nature, triggers, and effects of shame experiences in medical residents. Acad Med. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002479. Oct 1 [cited 2018 Oct 10] Epub ahead of print.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hooker C. Understanding empathy: why phenomenology and hermeneutics can help medical education and practice. Med Health Care Philos. 2015;2015(18):541–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Patel RS, Tarrant C, Bonas S, Shaw RL. Medical students’ personal experience of high-stakes failure: case studies using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Bmc Med Educ. 2015;15:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ajjawi R, Higgs J. Using hermeneutic phenomenology to investigate how experienced practitioners learn to communicate clinical reasoning. Qual Rep. 2007;12:612:38.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Teherani A, Martimianakis T, Stenfors-Hayes T, Wadhwa A, Varpio L. Choosing a qualitative research approach. J Grad Med Educ. 2015;7:669–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Contributions to phenomenology. In: Embree L, editor. Encyclopedia of phenomenology. Vol. 18. Netherlands: Springer; 1997.

  8. Ashworth P. An approach to phenomenological psychology: the contingencies of the lifeworld. J Phenom Psychol. 2003;34:145–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vagle M. Crafting phenomenological research. London and New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group; 2018.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Tuffour I. A critical overview of interpretative phenomenological analysis: a contemporary qualitative research approach. J Healthc Commun. 2017;2(4:52):1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Smith, David Woodruff. Phenomenology. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/phenomenology/. Accessed 9 Oct 2018.

  12. Manen MV. Researching lived experience: human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. London and New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Laverty SM. Hermeneutic phenomenology and phenomenology: a comparison of historical and methodological considerations. Int J Qual Methods. 2003;2:1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kafle NP. Hermeneutic phenomenological research method simplified. Bodhi: Interdiscip J. 2011;5:181–2.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jones WT. The twentieth century to Wittgenstein and Sartre. San Francisco, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich; 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Moran D. Introduction to phenomenology. Milton Park: Routledge; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Staiti A. The pedagogic impulse of Husserl’s ways into transcendental phenomenology: an alternative reading of the Erste Philosophie lecture. Grad Fac Philos J. 2012;33:39–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Moustakas CE. Phenomenological research methods. 1st ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 1994.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Husserl E. The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. 1st ed. Evanston: Northwestern University Press; 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Barua A. Husserl, Heidegger, and the transcendental dimension of phenomenology. Indo-Pacific J Phenomenol. 2015;7:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Reiners GM. Understanding the differences between Husserl’s (descriptive) and Heidegger’s (interpretive) phenomenological research. J Nurs Care. 2012;1:1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lopez KA, Willis DG. Descriptive versus interpretive phenomenology: their contributions to nursing knowledge. Qual Health Res. 2004;14:726–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Davidsen AS. Phenomenological approaches in psychology and health sciences. Qual Res Psychol. 2013;10:318–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Presuppose Nothing AP. The suspension of assumptions in phenomenological psychological methodology. J Phenomenol Psychol. 1996;27:1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gill MJ. The possibilities of phenomenology for organizational research. Organ Res Methods. 2014;17:118–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Colaizzi P. Psychological research as a phenomenologist views it. In: Valle RS, King M, editors. Existential-phenomenological alternatives for psychology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Giorgi A. Phenomenology and psychological research. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Polkinghorne DE. Phenomenological research methods. In: Valle RS, Halling S, editors. Existential-phenomenological perspectives in psychology: exploring the breadth of human experience. New York: Springer; 1989. pp. 41–60.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Varpio L, Martimianakis T, Mylopoulos M. Qualitative research methodologies: embracing methodological borrowing, shifting, and importing. In: Durning SJ, Cleland J, editors. Researching medical education. 1st ed. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell; 2015. pp. 245–55.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Arksey H, Knight PT. Interviewing for social scientists. London: SAGE; 1999.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Birt L, Scott S, Cavers D, Campbell C, Walter F. Member checking: a tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qual Health Res. 2016;26:1802–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tavakol S, Dennick R, Tavakol M. Medical students’ understanding of empathy: a phenomenological study. Med Educ. 2012;46:306–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Neumann M, Edelhauser F, Tauschel D, et al. Empathy decline and its reasons: a systematic review of studies with medical students and residents. Acad Med. 2011;86:996–1009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Del Canale S, Louis DZ, Maio V, et al. The relationship between physician empathy and disease complications: an empirical study of primary care physicians and their diabetic patients in Parma, Italy. Acad Med. 2012;87:1243–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Bynum W, Varpio L. When I say … hermeneutic phenomenology. Med Educ. 2018;52:252–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Enos T, editor. Encyclopedia of rhetoric and composition. New York: Routledge; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Heidegger M. Being and time. Blackwell: Oxford UK and Cambridge USA; 1867.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Van Manen M. Researching lived experience: human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Albany, NY: SUNY; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Van Manen M. Phenomenology of practice. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press, Inc; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Grondin J. Gadamer’s basic understanding of understanding. In: Dostal RJ, editor. The cambridge companion to Gadamer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002. pp. 36–51.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  41. Polkinghorne D. Methodology for the human sciences. Albany: SUNY; 1983.

    Google Scholar 


Page 2

From: How phenomenology can help us learn from the experiences of others

Phenomenological approach Description Key figures
Lifeworld research A blended approach that explores how daily experiences manifest in the lifeworld of individuals through consideration of selfhood, sociality, embodiment, temporality, and spatiality [8] Peter Ashworth, Karin Dahlberg
Post-intentional phenomenology A blended approach that treats the phenomenon as the unit of analysis but asserts that phenomena are multiple, partial, contextual, and in flux; being simultaneously produced and producing [9] Mark Vagle
Interpretive phenomenological analysis (IPA) A blended approach that aims to provide detailed examination of the lived experience of a phenomenon through participant’s personal experiences and personal perception of objects and events. In contrast to other approaches, in IPA the researcher performs an active role in the interpretive process [10] Jonathan Smith